Why independence is not the same as doing everything alone
A short piece on the difference between self-sufficiency and self-direction, and why the distinction matters for how we design tools.
There is a version of independence that treats support as failure. It shows up in policy, in product design, and in the way people talk about their own lives. It is quiet, but it does real damage.
A more useful definition begins with choice. Independence is the presence of choice, not the absence of support. A person who chooses which tools, services, and relationships fit their life is exercising more autonomy than a person who has been left to figure everything out alone.
This matters for design. A tool built to eliminate support tends to produce brittle experiences that break the moment a real human being is needed. A tool built to expand choice tends to fit into a life that already contains other people, other tools, and other decisions.
The goal is not to remove the humans. The goal is to give the person at the center of the picture more say.
Tip: most browsers and screen readers can read this article aloud. On desktop, try your browser's built-in read-aloud feature.